This is one of those things that just seems so close that it must mean something. Take a look at this.
m_p k_e = 195.61406 = 10^8 / 511210 ...(1)
m_p = \sqrt \frac {\hbar c} {G} ...(2)
k_e = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} ...(3)
G - Gravitational constant - 6.67384 .10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
\hbar - reduced Planck constant - 1.0545717.10-34 kg m2 s-1 C-2
c - speed of light - 299792458 m s-1
\epsilon_0 - permittivity of free space - 8.9875517.109 kg m3 s-2 C-2
now granted this is going to start looking like some numerology exercise, but bare with me. It's the 511210 that caught my eye and this is why
\frac {m_e c^2} {e} = V_e = 510998.9 eV ...(4)
5110210 / 510998.0 = 1.000415 , that is pretty close to unity. So close in fact that it would only involve a small change in the Gravitational constant for it to work. Try this, say we replace the 511210 with equation (4) to give
m_p k_e \approx \frac {e 10^8} {m_e c^2} = \frac {10^8} {V_e} ...(5)
sub in (2) and (3)
\sqrt \frac {\hbar c} {G} \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} = \frac {e 10^8} {m_e c^2} ...(6)
using (1), (2) & (3) we can show that
G = \frac {m_e^2 \hbar c^5} {e^2 (4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2 10^{16}} ...(7)
giving a value
G = 6.66837 .10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
That is less than 1% difference. So I thought I would give it an hour to see if there was anything to this. After all if I understood where the 108 comes from maybe we would have something. So lets do some more rearranging to get charge to mass ratio
\frac {e} {m_e} = \frac {m_p c^2} {4 \pi \epsilon_0 10^8} = \frac {E_p} {4 \pi \epsilon_0 10^8} ....(8)
E_p - Planck energy. This can easily be rearranged using
E_e = m_e c^2 ...(9)
and
c \mu_0 = 1 / c \epsilon_0 ....(10)
\mu_0 - permeability of free space - 4\pi 10^{-7}
to give
E_p E_e = e 10^{15} ...(11)
so what is the 10^{15} ? Let's take a look at the dimensions. Energy is Joules, e - charge is in Coulombs, so if we use
d = 10^{15}
E_p E_e = e d ...(12)
d has the units J^2 / C = V^2 C , so let us try
d = V_e V_p q_p ... (13)
V_p - Planck voltage - 1.04295 10^{27} V
q_p - Planck Charge - 1.875545 10^{-18} C
V_e - this is electron energy in electronVolts
so (12) becomes
E_p E_e = V_p q_p e V_e ...(14)
but
E_p = V_p q_p and E_e = e V_e by definition!
using (9) and dividing the above we get
\frac {q_p V_p} {m_p} = \frac {e V_e} {m_e} = c^2 ...(15)
using (15) we get
m_p = {q_p V_p} \frac{m_e}{e V_e} ...(16)
multiplying by k_e and rearranging gives
m_p k_e V_e = \frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e ....(17)
so substituting from (5) we should have
10^8 \approx \frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e ....(18)
doing the calculation
\frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e = 99858416 \approx 10^8 ....(19)
So that is what our 10^8 from (5) actually is! Had I been a little smarter and looked at (15) first then I could have saved myself a couple of hours. Maybe next time.
We can go a little further with this, but I think that this is probably a good place to finish.
No comments:
Post a Comment