Processing math: 100%

Monday, 7 October 2013

No Cigar

This is one of those things that just seems so close that it must mean something. Take a look at this.

m_p k_e = 195.61406 = 10^8 / 511210     ...(1)

m_p = \sqrt \frac {\hbar c} {G}       ...(2)
k_e = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0}    ...(3)

G - Gravitational constant - 6.67384 .10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
\hbar - reduced Planck constant - 1.0545717.10-34 kg m2 s-1 C-2
c - speed of light - 299792458 m s-1
\epsilon_0 - permittivity of free space - 8.9875517.109 kg m3 s-2 C-2

now granted this is going to start looking like some numerology exercise, but bare with me. It's the 511210 that caught my eye and this is why

\frac {m_e c^2} {e} = V_e =  510998.9   eV    ...(4)

5110210 / 510998.0 = 1.000415 , that is pretty close to unity. So close in fact that it would only involve a small change in the Gravitational constant for it to work. Try this, say we replace the 511210 with equation (4) to give

m_p k_e \approx  \frac {e 10^8} {m_e c^2} = \frac {10^8} {V_e}    ...(5)

sub in (2) and (3)

 \sqrt \frac {\hbar c} {G} \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_0} =  \frac {e 10^8} {m_e c^2}    ...(6)

using (1), (2) & (3) we can show that

G = \frac {m_e^2 \hbar c^5} {e^2 (4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2  10^{16}}     ...(7)

giving a value

G = 6.66837 .10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

That is less than 1% difference. So I thought I would give it an hour to see if there was anything to this. After all if I understood where the 108 comes from maybe we would have something. So lets do some more rearranging to get charge to mass ratio

\frac {e} {m_e} = \frac {m_p c^2} {4 \pi \epsilon_0  10^8} =   \frac {E_p} {4 \pi \epsilon_0  10^8}     ....(8)

E_p - Planck energy. This can easily be rearranged using

E_e = m_e c^2    ...(9)

and

c \mu_0 = 1 / c \epsilon_0    ....(10)

\mu_0 - permeability of free space - 4\pi  10^{-7}

to give

E_p E_e = e  10^{15}     ...(11)

so what is the 10^{15}  ? Let's take a look at the dimensions. Energy is Joules, e - charge is in Coulombs, so if we use

d = 10^{15}  

E_p E_e = e  d     ...(12)

d has the units J^2 / C = V^2 C , so let us try

d = V_e V_p q_p    ... (13)

V_p - Planck voltage - 1.04295   10^{27} V
q_p - Planck Charge - 1.875545   10^{-18} C
V_e - this is electron energy in electronVolts

so (12) becomes

  E_p E_e = V_p q_p  e V_e   ...(14)

but

E_p = V_p q_p    and   E_e =  e V_e by definition!

using (9) and dividing the above we get

\frac {q_p V_p} {m_p} = \frac {e V_e} {m_e} = c^2   ...(15)

using (15) we get

m_p = {q_p V_p} \frac{m_e}{e V_e}    ...(16)

multiplying by k_e and rearranging gives

m_p k_e V_e = \frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e    ....(17)

so substituting from (5) we should have

10^8 \approx \frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e     ....(18)

doing the calculation

\frac {m_e} {e} q_p V_p k_e = 99858416 \approx 10^8    ....(19)

So that is what our 10^8 from (5) actually is! Had I been a little smarter and looked at (15) first then I could have saved myself a couple of hours. Maybe next time.

We can go a little further with this, but I think that this is probably a good place to finish.

No comments:

Post a Comment

more like this

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...